Ontologies for edocument management in public administration
Identifieur interne : 000620 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000619; suivant : 000621Ontologies for edocument management in public administration
Auteurs :Source :
- Business Process Management Journal [ 1463-7154 ] ; 2006-01-01.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Action planning, Action research, Action research cycle, Administrative processes, Bpmj, Business model, Business networking, Commercial partners, Departmental borders, Document, Document management, Document processing, Electronic documents, Electronic record, Electronic records, European union, Exemplary projects, Further research, General guidelines, Indexing language, Informal ontology, Informatics department, Information management, Information resources, Information systems, Information technology, Informational resources, Infrastructure, International organization, Internet technologies, Klischewski, Knowledge management, Metadata, Metadata framework, Modernising government, Nancial resources, National archives, Natural language, Ontology, Organizational borders, Organizational context, Other actors, Other administrations, Paroplus project, Problem analysis, Problem diagnosis, Project activities, Project report, Public administration, Public administrations, Public record, Public record management, Records management, Relation types, Research question, Research report, Researcher, Retrieval, Same time, Small government, Standardization, Standards australia, State administration, State government, Strategic goals, Strategy development, Thesaurus, Topic maps, Work practice.
Abstract
Purpose This research seeks to explore the potential of ontologies for reorganizing edocument management in public administration with the aim of supporting administration in organizing crossorganizational document and information management. Designmethodologyapproach Since ontologies are suitable for organizing metadata for annotation of informational resources, the research question is How can public administrations make use of ontologies for organizing and improving their edocument management Findings, based on an action research project in the state administration of SchleswigHolstein Germany. Findings The research findings indicate that structuring documents and information through ontologies requires a sociotechnical infrastructure consisting of a number of regularities, services and support on the level of organization as well as information technology. Research limitationsimplications Since the case of SchleswigHolstein is typical for governments trying to enter the information age without having the power and resources to be on the leading edge, the recommendations based on this research may support the strategy development and solution finding in other administrations as well. Practical implications A rather small government such as that of SchleswigHolstein must be aware of its strategic goals and step ahead carefully in order to avoid the risks of misinvestment while reorganizing its edocument management. Originalityvalue The paper systematically addresses the question How can public administration make use of ontologies for organizing and improving their edocument management.
Url:
DOI: 10.1108/14637150610643742
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001083
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000D33
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000567
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000625
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000620
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Ontologies for edocument management in public administration</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:40CB0B78C5182764844CACA89FA8D73A60C9A669</idno><date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date><idno type="doi">10.1108/14637150610643742</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/4W2-LNXCQ8CJ-D/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001083</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001083</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000D33</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000567</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000567</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000625</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000620</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000620</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Ontologies for edocument management in public administration</title></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Business Process Management Journal</title><idno type="ISSN">1463-7154</idno><imprint><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><date type="published" when="2006-01-01">2006-01-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="34">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="47">47</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1463-7154</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1463-7154</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Action planning</term><term>Action research</term><term>Action research cycle</term><term>Administrative processes</term><term>Bpmj</term><term>Business model</term><term>Business networking</term><term>Commercial partners</term><term>Departmental borders</term><term>Document</term><term>Document management</term><term>Document processing</term><term>Electronic documents</term><term>Electronic record</term><term>Electronic records</term><term>European union</term><term>Exemplary projects</term><term>Further research</term><term>General guidelines</term><term>Indexing language</term><term>Informal ontology</term><term>Informatics department</term><term>Information management</term><term>Information resources</term><term>Information systems</term><term>Information technology</term><term>Informational resources</term><term>Infrastructure</term><term>International organization</term><term>Internet technologies</term><term>Klischewski</term><term>Knowledge management</term><term>Metadata</term><term>Metadata framework</term><term>Modernising government</term><term>Nancial resources</term><term>National archives</term><term>Natural language</term><term>Ontology</term><term>Organizational borders</term><term>Organizational context</term><term>Other actors</term><term>Other administrations</term><term>Paroplus project</term><term>Problem analysis</term><term>Problem diagnosis</term><term>Project activities</term><term>Project report</term><term>Public administration</term><term>Public administrations</term><term>Public record</term><term>Public record management</term><term>Records management</term><term>Relation types</term><term>Research question</term><term>Research report</term><term>Researcher</term><term>Retrieval</term><term>Same time</term><term>Small government</term><term>Standardization</term><term>Standards australia</term><term>State administration</term><term>State government</term><term>Strategic goals</term><term>Strategy development</term><term>Thesaurus</term><term>Topic maps</term><term>Work practice</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose This research seeks to explore the potential of ontologies for reorganizing edocument management in public administration with the aim of supporting administration in organizing crossorganizational document and information management. Designmethodologyapproach Since ontologies are suitable for organizing metadata for annotation of informational resources, the research question is How can public administrations make use of ontologies for organizing and improving their edocument management Findings, based on an action research project in the state administration of SchleswigHolstein Germany. Findings The research findings indicate that structuring documents and information through ontologies requires a sociotechnical infrastructure consisting of a number of regularities, services and support on the level of organization as well as information technology. Research limitationsimplications Since the case of SchleswigHolstein is typical for governments trying to enter the information age without having the power and resources to be on the leading edge, the recommendations based on this research may support the strategy development and solution finding in other administrations as well. Practical implications A rather small government such as that of SchleswigHolstein must be aware of its strategic goals and step ahead carefully in order to avoid the risks of misinvestment while reorganizing its edocument management. Originalityvalue The paper systematically addresses the question How can public administration make use of ontologies for organizing and improving their edocument management.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Informatique/explor/SgmlV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000620 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000620 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Informatique
|area= SgmlV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:40CB0B78C5182764844CACA89FA8D73A60C9A669
|texte= Ontologies for edocument management in public administration
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |